Both are SOLID players and either team would be happy with either player. FWIW Scout had Bell rated a 94 (as a junior) and Holt a 91 (as a senior). I believe Holt is more of a pure point guard where Bell is a shooting guard. I think one of the reasons Bell is rated a bit higher is due to the exposure of his AAU team. Of course we've seen 2 and 3 star players blow up and out play/perform 4 and 5 star guys... so take the "ratings" with some perspective. I think each players situation should be considered too. Holt has some fine guards in front of him, while the Zags are shall we say weakest at that position so Bell may initially "appear" to be the bigger impact player. But then again, we just never know.

Both great gets for the WCC.